Chuck Baldwin -- A Very Real New World Order

A VERY REAL NEW = WORLD=20 ORDER

By Chuck=20 Baldwin
January 27, 2009
NewsWithViews.com

It is hard to = believe, but a=20 majority of Americans (including Christians and conservatives) = seem=20 oblivious to the fact that there is a very real, very legitimate = New World=20 Order (NWO) unfolding. In the face of overwhelming evidence, most=20 Americans not only seem totally unaware of this reality, they seem = unwilling to even remotely entertain the notion.

On one=20 hand, it is understandable that so many Americans would be = ignorant of the=20 emerging New World Order. After all, the mainstream media refuses = to=20 report, or even acknowledge, the NWO. Even "conservative" = commentators and=20 talk show hosts such as Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Michael = Savage, or=20 Joe Scarborough refuse to discuss it. And when listeners call = these=20 respective programs, these "conservative" hosts usually resort to=20 insulting the caller as being some kind of "conspiracy kook." One = host=20 even railed that if anyone questions the government line on 9/11, = we=20 should "lock them up and throw away the key." So much for freedom = of=20 speech!

This is=20 an area--perhaps the central area--where liberals and = conservatives agree:=20 they both show no patience or tolerance for anyone who believes = that=20 global government (in any form) is evolving. One has to wonder how = otherwise intelligent and thoughtful people can be so brain dead = when it=20 comes to this issue. It makes one wonder who is really pulling = their=20 strings, doesn't it?

The list=20 of notable personalities who have openly referenced or called for = some=20 kind of global government or New World Order is extremely lengthy. = Are all=20 these people "kooks" or "conspiracy nuts"? Why would world=20 leaders--including presidents, secretaries of state, and high = government=20 officials; including the media, financial, and political = elite--constantly=20 refer to something that doesn't exist? Why would they write about, = talk=20 about, or openly promote a New World Order, if there is no such=20 thing?

Many of=20 us recall President George Herbert Walker Bush talking much about = an=20 emerging New World Order. For example, in 1989, Bush told the = students of=20 Texas A&M University, "Perhaps the world order of the future = will=20 truly be a family of nations."

Later,=20 Bush, Sr. said, "We have before us the opportunity to forge for = ourselves=20 and for future generations a new world order . . .. When we are=20 successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new = world order,=20 an order in which a credible United Nations can use its = peacekeeping role=20 to fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.'s = founders."

Bush,=20 Sr. also said, "What is at stake is more than one small country, = it is a=20 big idea--a new world order."

Bush,=20 Sr. further said, "The world can therefore seize the opportunity = to=20 fulfill the long-held promise of a new world order . . = ."

What was=20 President G.H.W. Bush talking about, if there is no such thing as = an=20 emerging New World Order? Was he talking out of his mind? Was he=20 hallucinating?

England's Prime = Minister,=20 Tony Blair, said, "We are all internationalists now, whether we = like it or=20 not." He continued saying, "On the eve of a new Millennium we are = now in a=20 new world. We need new rules for international co-operation and = new ways=20 of organizing our international institutions." He also said, = "Today the=20 impulse towards interdependence is immeasurably greater. We are = witnessing=20 the beginnings of a new doctrine of international = community."

In 1999,=20 Tony Blair said, "Globalization has transformed our economies and = our=20 working practices. But globalism is not just economic. It is also = a=20 political and security phenomenon."

What is=20 Tony Blair talking about, if there is no emerging New World Order? = What=20 does he mean by "a new doctrine of international community"? What = does he=20 mean by "new world"? How can one have globalism, which includes "a = political and security phenomenon," without creating a New World = Order? Is=20 Tony Blair hallucinating?

Likewise, former = President=20 George W. Bush penned his signature to the Declaration of Quebec = back on=20 April 22, 2001, in which he gave a "commitment to hemispheric = integration=20 and national and collective responsibility for improving the = economic=20 well-being and security of our people."

By "our=20 people," Bush meant the people of the Western Hemisphere, not the = people=20 of the United States. Phyllis Schlafly rightly reminded us that = G.W. Bush=20 "pledged that the United States will 'build a hemispheric family = on the=20 basis of a more just and democratic international = order.'"

Remember, too, = that it was=20 G.W. Bush who, back in 2005, committed the United States to the = Security=20 and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), which is nothing more than a = precursor=20 to the North American Community or Union, as outlined in CFR = member Robert=20 Pastor's manual, "Toward a North American Community."

If there=20 is no such thing as an emerging New World Order, what was G.W. = Bush=20 talking about when he referred to "a hemispheric family" and an=20 "international order"?

The=20 public statements of notable world leaders regarding an emerging = New World=20 Order are copious. Consider the statements of former CBS newsman, = Walter=20 Cronkite.

In his=20 book, "A Reporter's Life," Walter Cronkite said, "A system of = world=20 order--preferably a system of world government--is mandatory. The = proud=20 nations someday will see the light and, for the common good and = their own=20 survival, yield up their precious sovereignty . . ." Cronkite told = BBC=20 newsman Tim Sebastian, "I think we are realizing that we are going = to have=20 to have an international rule of law." He added, "We need not only = an=20 executive to make international law, but we need the military = forces to=20 enforce that law." Cronkite also said, "American people are going = to begin=20 to realize that perhaps they are going to have to yield some = sovereignty=20 to an international body to enforce world law."

If there=20 is no emerging New World Order, what is Walter Cronkite talking = about? Can=20 there be any doubt that Cronkite is talking about global = government?=20 Absolutely not!

Now,=20 when Bush, Sr. talks about fulfilling "the promise and vision of = the=20 U.N.'s founders," he was talking about the same thing former UN=20 Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali was talking about when he = said,=20 "The time for absolute and exclusive sovereignty . . . has=20 passed."

The=20 United Nations has been on the forefront of promoting the New = World Order=20 agenda since its very inception. In 1995, the UN released a manual = entitled, "Our Global Neighborhood." It states, "Population, = consumption,=20 technology, development, and the environment are linked in complex = relationships that bear closely on human welfare in the global=20 neighborhood. Their effective and equitable management calls for a = systematic, long-term, global approach guided by the principle of=20 sustainable development, which has been the central lesson from = the=20 mounting ecological dangers of recent times. Its universal = application is=20 a priority among the tasks of global governance."

If there=20 is no emerging New World Order, what is "global governance" all=20 about?

"Who are=20 the movers and shakers promoting global government?" you ask. = Obviously,=20 it is the international bankers who are the heavyweights behind = the push=20 for global government. Remember, one cannot create a "global = economy"=20 without a global government to manage, oversee, and control = it.

In a=20 letter written to Colonel E. Mandell House, President Franklin D.=20 Roosevelt said, "The real truth of the matter is, as you and I = know, that=20 a financial element in the large centers has owned the government = of the=20 U.S. since the days of Andrew Jackson."

"Old=20 Hickory" did his best to rid the United States from the death grip = that=20 the international bankers were beginning to exert on this country. = He may=20 have been the last President to actually oppose the bankers. In = discussing=20 the Bank Renewal bill with a delegation of bankers in 1832, = Jackson said,=20 "Gentlemen, I have had men watching you for a long time, and I am=20 convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in = the=20 breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits = amongst=20 you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me = that if I=20 take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter, I shall = ruin ten=20 thousand families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your = sin!=20 Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and = that=20 would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to = rout you=20 out, and by the eternal God, I will rout you out."

Unfortunately, the = international bankers proved themselves to be too formidable for = President=20 Jackson. And in 1913, with the collaboration of President Woodrow = Wilson,=20 the bankers were given charge over America's financial system by = the=20 creation of the Federal Reserve.

Ever=20 since the CFR and Trilateral Commission were created, they have = filled the=20 key leadership positions of government, big media, and of course, = the=20 Federal Reserve.

In his=20 book, "With No Apologies," former Republican Presidential nominee = Barry=20 Goldwater wrote, "The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the = vehicle=20 for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking = interests by=20 seizing control of the political government of the United States. = The=20 Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to = seize=20 control and consolidate the four centers of power-- political, = monetary,=20 intellectual and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateral Commission = intends is=20 to create a worldwide economic power superior to the political = governments=20 of the nation-states involved. As managers and creators of the = system,=20 they will rule the future." Was Goldwater a prophet or = what?

And=20 again, the goals of the global elite have been publicly stated. = Back in=20 1991, the founder of the CFR, David Rockefeller praised the major = media=20 for their complicity in helping to facilitate the globalist agenda = by=20 saying, "We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York = Times, Time=20 Magazine and other great publications whose directors have = attended our=20 meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost = forty=20 years. . . . It would have been impossible for us to develop our = plan for=20 the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity = during those=20 years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to = march=20 towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an=20 intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the = national=20 auto-determination practiced in past centuries."

How=20 could Rockefeller be any plainer? He acknowledged the willful = assistance=20 of the major media in helping to keep the elitists' agenda of = global=20 government from the American people. To this day, the major media = has not=20 deviated from that collaboration. And this includes the = aforementioned=20 "conservative" talking heads. They know if they want to keep their = jobs,=20 they dare not reveal the New World Order. The NWO, more than = anything=20 else, is the "Third Rail" to the national media.

Is it=20 any wonder that President Barack Obama has stacked his government = with=20 numerous members of the CFR? Among these are Robert Gates, Janet=20 Napolitano, Eric Shinseki, Timothy Geithner, and Tom Daschle. = Other CFR=20 members include CFR President Richard Haass, CFR Director Richard=20 Holbrooke, and founding member of the Trilateral Commission and = CFR member=20 Paul Volcker. Obama even asked a CFR member, Rick Warren, to = deliver the=20 inaugural prayer.

Still=20 not convinced? Just a few days ago, when asked by a reporter what = he=20 thought the most important thing was that Barack Obama could = accomplish,=20 former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger said, "I think his task = will be=20 develop an overall strategy for America in this period when, = really, a New=20 World Order can be created. It's a great opportunity; it isn't = just a=20 crisis."

This is=20 the same Henry Kissinger, you will recall, who said back in 1991, = "Today,=20 America would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to = restore=20 order. Tomorrow, they will be grateful! This is especially true if = they=20 were told that there were [sic] an outside threat from beyond, = whether=20 real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is = then that=20 all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this = evil. The=20 one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this = scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the = guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World=20 Government."

Even=20 Gideon Rachman, the chief foreign affairs commentator for the = Financial=20 Times, wrote an editorial expressing his support for world = government. In=20 his column he said, "I have never believed that there is a secret = United=20 Nations plot to take over the US. . . . But, for the first time in = my=20 life, I think the formation of some sort of world government is=20 plausible.

"A=20 'world government' would involve much more than co-operation = between=20 nations. It would be an entity with state-like characteristics, = backed by=20 a body of laws. The European Union has already set up a = continental=20 government for 27 countries, which could be a model. The EU has a = supreme=20 court, a currency, thousands of pages of law, a large civil = service and=20 the ability to deploy military force.

"So=20 could the European model go global? There are three reasons for = thinking=20 that it might."

Rachman=20 then goes on to explain the reasons why he believes world = government is=20 plausible.

Do you=20 now see why it does not matter to a tinker's dam whether it is a=20 Republican or Democrat who resides at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue? = For the=20 most part, both major parties in Washington, D.C., have been under = the=20 dominating influence of the international bankers who control the = Federal=20 Reserve, the CFR, and the Trilateral Commission. And this is also = why it=20 does not matter whether one calls himself conservative or liberal. = For the=20 most part, both conservatives and liberals in Washington, D.C., = are=20 facilitating the emerging New World Order. It is time we wake up = to this=20 reality.

Presidents Bush, = Sr., Bill=20 Clinton, and Bush, Jr. have thoroughly set the table for the=20 implementation of the NWO, as surely as the sun rises in the east. = All=20 Obama has to do is put the food on the table--and you can count on = this:=20 Barack Obama will serve up a New World Order feast like you cannot = believe!

That a=20 New World Order is emerging is not in question. The only question = is, What=20 will freedom-loving Americans do about it? Of course, the first = thing they=20 have to do is admit that an emerging New World Order exists! Until = conservatives, Christians, pastors, constitutionalists, and others = who=20 care about a sovereign, independent United States acknowledge the = reality=20 of an emerging New World Order, they will be incapable of opposing = it. And=20 right now, that is exactly what they are not doing.

*If you = appreciate=20 this column and want to help me distribute these editorial = opinions to an=20 ever-growing audience, donations may now be made by credit card, = check, or=20 Money Order. Use this=20 link.

Chuck=20 Baldwin is Founder-Pastor of Crossroads Baptist = Church in Pensacola, Florida. In 1985 the church was = recognized by President Ronald Reagan for its unusual growth and=20 influence.

Dr. Baldwin is the host of a lively, = hard-hitting=20 syndicated radio talk show on the Genesis Communications Network = called,=20 "Chuck Baldwin Live" This is a daily, one hour long call-in show = in which=20 Dr. Baldwin addresses current event topics from a conservative = Christian=20 point of view. Pastor Baldwin writes weekly articles on the = internet=20 http://www.ChuckBaldwinLive.com and newspapers. =20

To learn more about his radio talk show = please=20 visit his web site at: http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com= /.=20 When responding, please include your name, city and state.=20

E-mail: chuck@chuckbaldwinlive.com= =20